不同基质处理对蒜头果幼苗生长的影响

doi:10.19692/j.issn.1006-1126.20240107

广西林业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (1): 49-56.DOI: 10.19692/j.issn.1006-1126.20240107

不同基质处理对蒜头果幼苗生长的影响

杨卓颖, 梁文汇, 黄晓露, 李宝财, 杨日升, 廖健明

广西壮族自治区林业科学研究院广西特色经济林培育与利用重点实验室,广西南宁 530002

收稿日期:2023-04-10 出版日期:2024-02-29 发布日期:2024-03-07
通讯作者: 黄晓露（1987 — ）,女,高级工程师,主要从事经济林育种与栽培研究。
作者简介:杨卓颖（1995 — ），男，助理工程师，主要从事经济林育种与栽培研究。
基金资助:
广西林业科技推广示范项目（2023LYKJ05）

Effects of Different Substrate Treatments on Growths of Malania oleifera Seedlings

Yang Zhuoying, Liang Wenhui, Huang Xiaolu, Li Baocai, Yang Risheng, Liao Jianming

Guangxi Forestry Research Institute, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Special Non-wood Forests Cultivation and Utilization, Nanning, Guangxi 530002, China

Received:2023-04-10 Online:2024-02-29 Published:2024-03-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高蒜头果（Malania oleifera）幼苗品质和造林成活率,以泥炭土、轻基质、黄心土、松针、蛭石和珍珠岩为原料,设计9个不同基质处理,测定蒜头果幼苗生长和生物量指标,并分析其与基质理化性质的相关性,结合主成分分析对不同基质处理进行综合评价。结果表明,在不同基质处理下,蒜头果幼苗生长指标均存在差异。T5处理的苗高和地径总生长量均最高,分别为69.39 cm和8.31 mm。T1处理的地上部分鲜质量总重、全株鲜质量、地上部分干质量总重和全株干质量均最高,分别为36.13、69.97、15.57和25.94 g。T8处理的地下部分鲜质量和地下部分干质量均最高,分别为37.03和11.13 g。苗高与土壤密度呈显著负相关,与速效磷含量呈显著正相关,与速效氮和速效钾含量均呈极显著正相关。地径与土壤密度呈极显著负相关,与田间持水量和总孔隙度均呈显著正相关,与速效氮和速效钾含量均呈极显著正相关。幼苗地上部分鲜质量、全株鲜质量和地上部分干质量均与总孔隙度呈显著正相关。全株鲜质量与速效氮含量呈显著正相关。T1处理的叶生物量和全株生物量均最高,综合得分最高;T5处理的苗高和地径均表现最好,叶生物量低于T1处理;T8处理的根系生长最好,最有利于幼苗地下部分生长;这3个基质配方均适用于蒜头果幼苗培育。

关键词: 基质处理, 苗高, 地径, 生物量, 主成分分析, 蒜头果

Abstract: In order to improve quality of Malania oleifera seedlings and survival rates of afforestation, nine different substrate treatments were designed with peat soils, light substrates, yellow soils, pine needles, vermiculite and perlite. Indexes of growth and biomass of M. oleifera seedlings were measured and correlations among indexes of growth and biomass and physico-chemical properties of substrates were analyzed. Different substrate treatments were comprehensively evaluated by principal component analysis. Results showed that growth indexes of M. oleifera seedlings were different among different substrate treatments. T5 treatment had the highest total growths in seedling height and ground diameter, which were 69.39 cm and 8.31 mm respectively. T1 treatment had the highest total fresh weight of above-ground part (36.13 g), fresh weight of whole plant (69.97 g), total dry weight of above-ground part (15.57 g) and dry weight of whole plant (25.94 g). T8 treatment had the highest fresh weight of under-ground part and dry weight of under-ground part, which were 37.03 and 11.13 g respectively. Seedling height had significantly negative correlation with soil density, had significantly positive correlation with content of available phosphorus, and had extremely significantly positive correlations with contents of available nitrogen and available potassium. Ground diameter had significantly negative correlation with soil density, had significantly positive correlations with field capacity and total porosity, and had extremely significantly positive correlations with contents of available nitrogen and available potassium. Fresh weight of above-ground part, fresh weight of whole plant and dry weight of above-ground part had significantly positive correlations with total porosity. Fresh weight of whole plant had significantly positive correlation with content of available nitrogen. Leaf biomass and whole plant biomass of seedlings in T1 treatment were the highest and comprehensive score of principal component analysis was the best. Seedling height and ground diameter were the highest in T5 treatment with lower leaf biomass than T1 treatment. Root growth in T8 treatment was the best, which was conducive to growths of under-ground parts of M. oleifera seedlings. T1, T5 and T8 treatments were suitable for M. oleifera seedling cultivation.

Key words: substrate treatment, seedling height, ground diameter, biomass, principal component analysis, Malania oleifera

中图分类号:

S792.99

杨卓颖, 梁文汇, 黄晓露, 李宝财, 杨日升, 廖健明. 不同基质处理对蒜头果幼苗生长的影响[J]. 广西林业科学, 2024, 53(1): 49-56.

Yang Zhuoying, Liang Wenhui, Huang Xiaolu, Li Baocai, Yang Risheng, Liao Jianming. Effects of Different Substrate Treatments on Growths of Malania oleifera Seedlings[J]. GUANGXI FORESTRY SCIENCE, 2024, 53(1): 49-56.

参考文献

[1] 傅立国. 中国植物红皮书——稀有濒危植物:第一册[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1991.
[2] 卯吉华,贾代顺,陈福,等. 珍稀濒危植物蒜头果芽苗砧嫁接技术体系研究[J]. 西部林业科学,2018,47(5):39-45.
[3] 龚茂佳,王娟,付小勇,等. 云南广西蒜头果适生区预测及环境影响因子[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2022,46(2):44-52.
[4] 周永红,李伟光,易封萍,等. 气相色谱-质谱法测定蒜头果油中的脂肪酸[J]. 色谱,2001,19(2):147-148.
[5] 赵劲平,欧乞鍼. 蒜头果仁油的应用研究[J]. 中国油脂,2010,35(7):12-16.
[6] 陈强,常恩福,李品荣,等. 滇东南岩溶山区造林树种选择试验[J]. 云南林业科技,2001(3):11-16.
[7] 汪秀玲,郑文华,凌高潮,等. 不同基质配比和缓释肥用量对虎皮楠容器苗生长影响[J]. 南方林业科学,2022,50(3):18-22.
[8] 杜洋文,程军勇,邓先珍. 薄壳山核桃不同基质配方容器苗质量综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报,2021,37(16):26-32.
[9] 刘泽茂,杨晓玥,吴文,等. 不同容器和基质配比对榉树容器苗生长的影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2022,42(1):68-75.
[10] 蓝金宣,梁文汇,黄晓露,等. 千年桐嫁接愈合过程解剖结构与内源激素的变化[J]. 广西林业科学,2021,50(2):144-149.
[11] 查同刚. 土壤理化分析[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,2017.
[12] 黄晓露,李宝财,骆相华,等. 蒜头果种子形态特征及脂肪酸组成分析[J]. 森林与环境学报,2022,42(6):663-672.
[13] 刘峰,王紫琦,吴文,等. 不同基质配比对乌桕容器苗矿质元素和非结构性碳水化合物的影响[J]. 林业与生态科学,2022,37(3):275-278.
[14] 李宝财,梁文汇,蓝金宣,等. 不同沙土配比基质对岗松幼苗根系形态及营养吸收的影响[J]. 广西林业科学,2021,50(2):157-163.
[15] 杨晓慧,徐放,杨会肖,等. 红锥育苗基质筛选[J]. 林业与环境科学,2021,37(1):73-83.
[16] 杨晓慧,杨会肖,徐放,等. 不同育苗容器对红锥苗期生长及根系发育的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报,2021,41(11):16-26.
[17] 许雪英. 苗木类型对造林早期枫香幼树生长的影响[J]. 亚热带农业研究,2020,16(4):242-246.
[18] 王光生,吴楠,崔永忠. 优良绿化树种翠柏容器苗与裸根苗培育研究[J]. 安徽林业科技,2015,41(6):35-37.
[19] 陈琳,曾杰,贾宏炎. 容器规格和基质配方对红锥幼苗生长及造林效果的影响[J]. 林业科学,2017,53(3):76-83.

不同基质处理对蒜头果幼苗生长的影响

Effects of Different Substrate Treatments on Growths of Malania oleifera Seedlings

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨正道, 舒清态, 黄金君, 周文武, 胥丽, 罗绍龙, 王书伟. 基于无人机多光谱的高山松地上生物量估测[J]. 广西林业科学, 2024, 53(1): 10-17.
[2]	王博, 许昊, 金学娟, 王晓华, 锁岚. 立地因子对柠条生物量动态变化的影响[J]. 广西林业科学, 2024, 53(1): 18-26.
[3]	曾春阳, 刘峰, 徐庆玲, 李恒, 莫祝坤, 黄正深. 广西桉树地径与胸径多元混合效应模型研建[J]. 广西林业科学, 2023, 52(5): 569-574.
[4]	王琼芳, 张璐, 张晓庆, 陈智平, 闫月娥, 赵万奎, 赵方圆. 2016 — 2019年白龙江林区森林碳储量动态及碳汇特征分析[J]. 广西林业科学, 2023, 52(1): 31-38.
[5]	王雪纯, 黄德帅, 王瑜, 蔡年辉. 云南松苗期不同器官生物量相关性及异速生长关系[J]. 广西林业科学, 2023, 52(1): 60-65.
[6]	黄晓露, 杨日升, 骆相华, 苏方贵, 李宝财, 杨卓颖, 梁文汇. 广西4个蒜头果家系幼苗光合生理特征分析[J]. 广西林业科学, 2022, 51(4): 482-488.
[7]	黄莉雅, 黄俊才, 廖南燕, 刘菲, 蒋燚, 罗敦, 彭志锋, 梁晨, 陈生. 基于主成分分析与聚类分析的森林质量评价——以广西国有博白林场为例[J]. 广西林业科学, 2022, 51(4): 543-548.
[8]	席守鸿, 王玉凤, 谭玲, 覃林. 南亚热带乡土阔叶树种和桉树人工林土壤酶活性分析[J]. 广西林业科学, 2022, 51(3): 317-325.
[9]	吴友良, 卢宗军, 陈晓明, 陈代喜, 李富洲, 孙玮, 陈琴. 不同密度杉木成熟林土壤酶活性与微生物生物量分析[J]. 广西林业科学, 2022, 51(3): 353-356.
[10]	洪倩, 刘建林, 丰佳, 梁振明, 罗绍青, 胡笳. 人为干扰对特高压工程塔基区物种多样性与生物量的影响[J]. 广西林业科学, 2022, 51(2): 197-204.
[11]	卢庸, 覃凌薇, 李琳, 王凌晖. 不同光照处理对赤苍藤光合生理和生化特性的影响[J]. 广西林业科学, 2022, 51(2): 223-228.
[12]	蒲旭斌, 郭松, 李在留, 谢伟东. 泡核桃叶水浸提液对草珊瑚种子萌发和幼苗生长的化感效应[J]. 广西林业科学, 2021, 50(6): 678-684.
[13]	张紫依, 黄履山, 陈广财, 徐凤翠, 和太平. 广西隆安县野生种子植物区系分析[J]. 广西林业科学, 2021, 50(5): 585-593.
[14]	张日施, 汤雷吼, 曹继钊, 何斌, 惠柳笛, 南雅薇. 桂西南不同林龄马尾松人工林生物生产力及其分布特征[J]. 广西林业科学, 2021, 50(4): 373-377.
[15]	李玉凤, 秦佳双, 梁燕, 马姜明, 颜培栋, 杨章旗, 李明金. 两种密度马尾松人工林地上生物量模型及分配特征[J]. 广西林业科学, 2021, 50(4): 378-385.